🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed documentarian has become beyond being a historical storyteller; he represents an institution, a one-man industrial complex. When he has documentary series premiering on the small screen, all desire his attention.

Burns has done “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he says, nearing the end of nine-month promotional tour comprising 40 cities, 80 screenings and hundreds of interviews. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Happily the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as expressive in conversation as he is productive while filmmaking. At seventy-two has appeared at locations ranging from Monticello to popular podcasts to discuss one of his most ambitious projects: The American Revolution, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed the past decade of his life and debuted this week on PBS.

Classic Documentary Style

Comparable to methodical preparation in an age of fast food, Burns’ latest project intentionally classic, evoking memories of traditional war documentaries rather than contemporary digital documentaries new media formats.

However, for the filmmaker, who has built a career exploring national heritage covering diverse cultural topics, the revolutionary period transcends ordinary historical coverage but essential. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates by phone from New York.

Extensive Historical Investigation

Burns and his collaborators plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward utilized countless written sources and primary source materials. Dozens of historians, representing diverse viewpoints, provided on-air commentary along with leading scholars representing multiple disciplines like African American history, indigenous peoples’ narratives and the British empire.

Characteristic Narrative Method

The film’s approach will appear similar to devotees of The Civil War. The unique approach incorporated gradual camera movements over historical images, abundant historical musical selections featuring talent voicing historical documents.

Those projects established Burns built his legacy; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can apparently summon numerous talented actors. Appearing alongside Burns at a recent event, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”

Remarkable Ensemble

The extended filming period also helped regarding scheduling. Sessions happened in studios, in relevant places through digital platforms, a tool embraced amid COVID restrictions. Burns recounts collaborating with actor Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to perform his role portraying the founding father before flying off to his next engagement.

Brolin is joined by multiple distinguished artists, respected performing veterans, Domhnall Gleeson, Amanda Gorman, Jonathan Groff, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, Damian Lewis, Laura Linney, Tobias Menzies, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, small and big screen veterans, plus additional notable names.

Burns adds: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast recruited for any project. They do an extraordinary service. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I became frustrated when someone asked, about the prominent cast. I go, ‘These are actors.’ They represent global acting excellence and they animate historical material.”

Historical Complexity

However, no contemporary observers remain, modern media compelled the production to depend substantially on primary texts, combining personal accounts of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to present viewers not just the famous founders of the revolution but also to “dozens of others essential to the narrative, several participants never even had a portrait painted.

The filmmaker also explored his individual interest for geography and cartography. “Maps fascinate me,” he comments, “featuring increased geographical representation throughout this series versus earlier productions throughout my entire career.”

International Impact

The production crew recorded at nearly a hundred historical locations in various American regions and British sites to document environmental context and partnered extensively with living history participants. All these elements combine to depict events more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing compared to standard education.

The film maintains, transcended provincial conflict concerning territory, taxes and political voice. Rather, the series depicts a blood-soaked struggle that finally engaged more than two dozen nations and improbably came to embody termed “mankind’s greatest hopes”.

Internal Conflict Truth

Initial complaints and protests leveled at London by far-flung British subjects in 13 fractious colonies rapidly became a brutal civil conflict, setting brother against brother and turning communities into battlegrounds. In one segment, academic Alan Taylor comments: “The greatest misconception concerning independence struggle involves believing it represented a consolidating event for colonists. It leaves out the reality that it was a civil war among Americans.”

Sophisticated Interpretation

For him, the independence account that “for most of us is drowning in sentimentality and wistful remembrance and is incredibly superficial and fails to properly acknowledge for what actually took place, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”

The historian argues, an uprising that declared the transformative concept of the unalienable rights of people; a bloody domestic struggle, separating rebels and supporters; and a global war, continuing previous patterns of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for the “prize of North America”.

Uncertain Historical Outcomes

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the